4.6 Article

miR-181b increases drug sensitivity in acute myeloid leukemia via targeting HMGB1 and Mcl-1

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 383-392

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2390

关键词

miRNA; HMGB1; Mcl-1; acute myeloid leukemia

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81070422, 30871088, 81070407, 81000223]
  2. SRFDP of Educational Ministry [20100131110060]
  3. Medical and Health Science Technology Development of Shandong Province, China [2013WS0229]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidrug resistance (MDR) remains the major cause of disease relapse and poor prognosis in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Emerging evidence shows that drug resistance not only exists against conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, but also limits the efficacy of new biological agents. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the mechanisms through which AML patients develop drug resistance. MicroRNAs have been shown to play an important role in regulating the chemotherapy resistance in AML. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms of microRNA that are clinically relevant in AML may enhance our ability to predict and overcome drug resistance. Here, we demonstrated, for the first time, that miR-181b was decreased significantly in human multidrug-resistant leukemia cells and relapsed/refractory AML patient samples. Overexpression of miR-181b increased the sensitivity of leukemia cells to cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and promoted drug-induced apoptosis. Moreover, miR-181b inhibited HMGB1 and Mcl-1 expression by direct binding to their 3'-untranslated regions. In addition, HMGB1 was expressed at high levels in relapsed/refractory AML patients and suppression of HMGB1 via RNA interference sensitized multidrug-resistant leukemia cells to chemotherapy and induced apoptosis. In conclusion, these results provide a strong rationale for the development of miR-181b-based therapeutic strategies for the enhancement of efficacy in AML treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据