4.6 Article

A peptide antigen derived from EGFR T790M is immunogenic in non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 497-504

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2787

关键词

acquired resistance; CTL epitope; EGFR T790M; immunotherapy; non-small cell lung cancer

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [25-A-7]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), such as gefitinib and erlotinib, have demonstrated marked clinical activity against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, in most cases, patients develop acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy. The threonine to methionine change at codon 790 of EGFR (EGFR T790M) mutation is the most common acquired resistance mutation, and is present in 50% cases of TKI resistance. New treatment strategies for NSCLC patients harboring the EGFR T790M mutation are required. We evaluated the immunogenicity of an antigen derived from EGFR with the T790M mutation. Using BIMAS we selected several EGFR T790M-derived peptides bound to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02:01. T790M-A peptide (789-797) (IMQLMPFGC)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) were induced from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of HLA-A2(+) healthy donors. An established T790M-A-specific CTL line showed reactivity against the NCSLC cell line, H1975-A2 (HLA-A2(+), T790M(+)), but not H1975 (HLA-A2(-), T790M(+)), and the corresponding wild-type peptide (ITQLMPFGC)-pulsed T2 cells using an interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) enzyme-linked immuno spot (ELISPOT) assay. This CTL line also demonstrated peptide-specific cytotoxicity against H1975-A2 cells. This finding suggests that the EGFR T790M mutation-derived antigen could be a new target for cancer immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据