4.5 Article

Association of elevation, urbanization and ambient temperature with obesity prevalence in the United States

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
卷 37, 期 10, 页码 1407-1412

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2013.5

关键词

altitude; geographic; GIS; urbanization; hypoxia; BRFSS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The macrogeographic distribution of obesity in the United States, including the association between elevation and body mass index (BMI), is largely unexplained. This study examines the relationship between obesity and elevation, ambient temperature and urbanization. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data from a cross-sectional, nationally representative sample of 422 603 US adults containing BMI, behavioral (diet, physical activity, smoking) and demographic (age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, employment, income) variables from the 2011 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were merged with elevation and temperature data from WorldClim and with urbanization data from the US Department of Agriculture. There was an approximately parabolic relationship between mean annual temperature and obesity, with maximum prevalence in counties with average temperatures near 18 degrees C. Urbanization and obesity prevalence exhibited an inverse relationship (30.9% in rural or nonmetro counties, 29.2% in metro counties with <250 000 people, 28.1% in counties with population from 250 000 to 1 million and 26.2% in counties with >1 million). After controlling for urbanization, temperature category and behavioral and demographic factors, male and female Americans living <500 m above sea level had 5.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-9.5) and 3.9 (95% CI 1.6-9.3) times the odds of obesity, respectively, as compared with counterparts living >= 3000 m above sea level. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity prevalence in the United States is inversely associated with elevation and urbanization, after adjusting for temperature, diet, physical activity, smoking and demographic factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据