4.5 Article

Relation of regional gray and white matter volumes to current BMI and future increases in BMI: a prospective MRI study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 656-664

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2011.175

关键词

weight gain; voxel-based morphometry; brain volume; impulsivity

资金

  1. Roadmap Supplement for Interdisciplinary Research in Behavioral and Biological Sciences [R1MH64560A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study tested whether global and regional brain volumes correlated with body mass index (BMI) and increases in BMI over 1-year follow-up. Methods: A total of 83 young females (M age = 18.4, s.d. = 2.8; BMI range = 17.3-38.9) were scanned using magnetic resonance imaging. Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess global brain volume and regional gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes in regions implicated in taste, reward and inhibitory control. Results: Obese participants had less total GM volume than lean and overweight participants. Obese participants had lower total WM volume than overweight participants. BMI correlated with higher WM volumes in the middle temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, Rolandic operculum and dorsal striatum. Trend-level reduced GM volumes in the superior frontal gyrus and middle frontal gyrus were related to increases in BMI over 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: Findings suggest that BMI is related to global and regional differences in brain matter volume in female adolescents. Most importantly, findings suggest that low GM volume in regions implicated in inhibitory control are related to future weight gain. Results taken in conjunction with prior findings suggest that abnormalities in regional GM volumes, but not WM volumes, increase the risk for future weight gain and abnormalities in regional WM volumes, but not GM volumes, are secondary to weight gain. International Journal of Obesity (2012) 36, 656-664; doi:10.1038/ijo.2011.175; published online 6 September 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据