4.5 Article

Lack of association between body mass index and plasma adiponectin levels in healthy adults

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
卷 35, 期 12, 页码 1487-1494

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2011.20

关键词

adiponectin; TNF alpha; IL-6; leptin; gender; meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To test the hypothesis that obesity (increase in fat mass) independently affects the level of adipokines: adiponectin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) and interleukin (IL)-6. Methods: Publications in the past decade reporting adult plasma adiponectin, leptin, TNF alpha and/or IL-6 levels were compiled. Mean gender-specific values were extracted from studies that included medical screening to confirm physical health (43 groups, total 4852 subjects). Correlation analysis was conducted between adipokine levels and body mass index (BMI), a widely used estimate of adiposity. Results: For healthy lean to obese adults of both genders, no significant correlation between plasma adiponectin and BMI was detected. There was also no gender difference in plasma adiponectin level. In contrast, leptin levels showed a positive correlation with BMI in both genders, and women had significantly higher levels of plasma leptin consistent with a higher percentage of body fat. The proinflammatory cytokine TNF alpha failed to show correlation with BMI. Although IL-6 showed a positive correlation with BMI in women, the obesity-related increase was very limited. Conclusions: Data analysis based on studies performed on healthy adults did not support the hypothesis that obesity independently affects the plasma level of adiponectin and TNF alpha. Reported obesity-related changes in plasma adipokine levels may be a consequence of obesity-related metabolic disorders. Future studies are especially needed to understand the homeostasis of adiponectin. International Journal of Obesity (2011) 35, 1487-1494; doi:10.1038/ijo.2011.20; published online 1 March 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据