4.5 Article

'I just can't help myself': effects of food-cue exposure in overweight and lean individuals

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 142-149

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2010.117

关键词

overweight; food cues; externality; cue reactivity; salivation; portion size

资金

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-000-22-1745]
  2. ESRC [ES/D000963/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/D000963/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Even brief exposure to the sight and smell of food has been shown to increase reported appetite, initiate 'cephalic phase responses,' and increase planned and actual consumption. This experiment tested the hypothesis that overweight individuals are especially sensitive to these established effects of food-cue exposure. Design: Overweight (n = 52) and normal-weight (n = 52) participants were exposed to the sight and smell of a 'cued' food (pizza) for 60 s. Before and after this period, we assessed salivation, prospective (planned) portion size, and desire to eat pizza and other 'non-cued' foods. Participants were then offered ad libitum access to pizza. Results: Consistent with previous studies, food-cue exposure increased rated hunger and desire to eat, increased prospective portion size of all savory foods, and increased salivation. In overweight individuals, cue exposure (i) elicited a significantly greater salivary response and, (ii) evoked a significantly greater increase in desire to eat both the cued food and another non-cued food. Conclusion: After cue exposure, overweight individuals experience a greater motivation to consume food but do not desire or consume greater amounts of food. These findings are consistent with evidence that snacking and meal variability predict weight gain and they expose 'cue reactiveness' as a potential predisposing factor for overweight. International Journal of Obesity (2011) 35, 142-149; doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.117; published online 15 June 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据