4.5 Review

Metabolic consequences of the presence or absence of the thermogenic capacity of brown adipose tissue in mice (and probably in humans)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 S7-S16

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2010.177

关键词

brown adipose tissue; UCP1; nonshivering thermogenesis; diet-induced thermogenesis; leptin; cold tolerance

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Cancer Society
  3. European Union

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Only with the development of the uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1)-ablated mouse has it become possible to strictly delineate the physiological significance of the thermogenic capacity of brown adipose tissue. Considering the presence of active brown adipose tissue in adult humans, these insights may have direct human implications. In addition to classical nonshivering thermogenesis, all adaptive adrenergic thermogeneses, including diet-induced thermogenesis, is fully dependent on brown adipocyte activity. Any weight-reducing effect of beta(3)-adrenergic agonists is fully dependent on UCP1 activity, as is any weight-reducing effect of leptin (in excess of its effect on reduction of food intake). Consequently, in the absence of the thermogenic activity of brown adipose tissue, obesity develops spontaneously. The ability of brown adipose tissue to contribute to glucose disposal is also mainly related to thermogenic activity. However, basal metabolic rate, cold-induced thermogenesis, acute cold tolerance, fevers, nonadaptive adrenergic thermogenesis and processes such as angiogenesis in brown adipose tissue itself are not dependent on UCP1 activity. Whereas it is likely that these conclusions are also qualitatively valid for adult humans, the quantitative significance of brown adipose tissue for human metabolism-and the metabolic consequences for a single individual possessing more or less brown adipose tissue-awaits clarification. International Journal of Obesity (2010) 34, S7-S16; doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.177

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据