4.5 Article

Grape seed proanthocyanidins correct dyslipidemia associated with a high-fat diet in rats and repress genes controlling lipogenesis and VLDL assembling in liver

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
卷 33, 期 9, 页码 1007-1012

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2009.136

关键词

high-fat diet; liver; proanthocyanidins; triglycerides; SREBP1; MTP

资金

  1. Spanish Direccion General de Investigacion del Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [AGL2008-00387]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether proanthocyanidins can protect against dyslipidemia induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) and to address the mechanisms that underlie this hypolipidemic effect. Design and measurements: Female Wistar rats were fed on a HFD for 13 weeks. They were divided into two groups, one of which was treated with a grape seed proanthocyanidin extract (25 mg kg(-1) of body weight) for 10 days. Plasma and liver lipids were measured by colorimetric and gravimetric analysis. Liver, muscle and adipose tissue were used to study the expression of genes involved in the synthesis and oxidation of fatty acids and lipoprotein homeostasis by real-time RT-PCR. Results: The administration of proanthocyanidins normalized plasma triglyceride and LDL-cholesterol (both parameters significantly increased with the HFD) but tended to decrease hypercholesterolemia and fatty liver. Gene expression analyses revealed that proanthocyanidins repressed both the expression of hepatic key regulators of lipogenesis and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) assembling such as SREBP1, MTP and DGAT2, all of which were overexpressed by the HFD. Conclusion: These findings indicate that natural proanthocyanidins improve dyslipidemia associated with HFDs, mainly by repressing lipogenesis and VLDL assembly in the liver, and support the idea that they are powerful agents for preventing and treating lipid altered metabolic states. International Journal of Obesity (2009) 33, 1007-1012; doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.136; published online 7 July 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据