4.5 Article

Resistance exercise training during pregnancy and newborn's birth size: a randomised controlled trial

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
卷 33, 期 9, 页码 1048-1057

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2009.150

关键词

resistance exercise; birth size; pregnancy; maternal body weight

资金

  1. I3 2006
  2. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia, Spain
  3. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS)
  4. [EX-2007-1124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We examined the effect of light intensity resistance exercise training performed during the second and third trimester of pregnancy on the newborn's birth size. We also studied the association between maternal body weight prior to pregnancy and newborn's birth size. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Subjects: We randomly assigned 160 sedentary gravidae to either a training (n = 80) or a control (n = 80) group. The training programme focused on light resistance and toning exercises (three times per week, 35-40 min per session). We recorded the Apgar score, birth weight, birth length, and head circumference of the newborn, as well as gestational age at time of delivery from hospital perinatal records. We also measured maternal weight and height before parity and gestational weight gain. Results: Maternal characteristics neither differed between groups (all P > 0.1) nor newborn characteristics (all P > 0.1). Maternal body weight was positively and significantly associated with newborn's birth weight and length only in the control group (beta = 19.20 and 0.065, respectively, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Light intensity resistance training performed over the second and third trimester of pregnancy does not have a negative impact on the newborn's body size or overall health. Exercise interventions might attenuate the adverse consequences of maternal body weight before pregnancy on the newborn's birth size. International Journal of Obesity (2009) 33, 1048-1057; doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.150; published online 28 July 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据