Metabolic responses to long-term pharmacological inhibition of CB1-receptor activity in mice in relation to dietary fat composition

Background and objectives: The antiobesity effects of suppressed endocannabinoid signaling may rely, at least in part, on changes in lipid fluxes. As fatty acids exert specific effects depending on their level of saturation, we hypothesized that the dietary fatty acid composition would influence the outcome of treatment with a CB1-receptor antagonist (rimonabant). Methods: Mice were treated with rimonabant (10 mg kg(-1) body weight per day) or vehicle while equicalorically fed either a low-fat diet (LF), a high-fat (HF) diet or an HF diet in which 10% of the saturated fatty acids (SFAs) were replaced by polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) from fish oil (FO). Food intake and body weight were registered daily. Indirect calorimetry was performed and feces were collected. After 3 weeks, mice were killed for blood and tissue collection. Results: Relative to the LF diet, the HF diet caused anticipated metabolic derangements, which were partly reversed by the HF/FO diet. The HF/FO diet, however, was most obesity-promoting despite inhibiting lipogenesis as indicated by low gene expression levels of lipogenic enzymes. On all three diets, rimonabant treatment improved metabolic derangements and led to significantly lower body weight gain than their respective controls. This latter effect appeared largest in the HF/FO group, but occurred without major changes in nutrient absorption and energy expenditure. Conclusion: The effects of chronic rimonabant treatment on body weight gain occurred irrespective of diet-induced changes in lipogenic activity, food intake and daily energy expenditure, and were, in fact, most pronounced in HF/FO mice. The effects of dietary PUFA replacement in an HF diet on expansion of adipose tissue might allow the favorable effects of dietary PUFA on dyslipidemia and hepatic steatosis. In light of other disadvantageous effects of weight gain, this might be a risky trade-off. International Journal of Obesity ( 2010) 34, 374-384; doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.219; published online 20 October 2009