4.2 Article

Serum CRP and urinary trypsin inhibitor implicate postoperative cognitive dysfunction especially in elderly patients

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 125, 期 7, 页码 501-506

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00207454.2014.949341

关键词

POCD; inflammatory cytokines; elderly; urinary trypsin inhibitor

资金

  1. capital foundation of clinical characteristics application [Z131107002213067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (FOOD) characterized as the decline of memory and executive function after major surgery is not well illustrated. The aim of this study is to discover whether inflammatory cytokines and urinary trypsin inhibitor (uTi) contribute to the development of FOOD. Method: Sixty-three patients undergoing lumber discectomy and 47 age-matched control volunteers were involved in this study. The level of C-reaction protein (CRP) and uTi/urine creatinine (Ucr) was measured by immunoturbidimetry and enzyme-inhibition assay, respectively. Meanwhile, ELISA was involved to detect the level of IL-6, IL-10, MMP-9 in serum. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test was used to determine the cognitive decline of the patients and age-matched controls. Result: In FOOD group, the level of IL-6, IL-10, CRP, MMP-9 in serum and uTi/Ucr in urine was significantly higher than that in the group without FOOD. The FOOD was more frequently observed in elderly group than in the middle-aged group (43.75% versus 19.35%, p = 0.038). After logistic regression analysis adjusted by the age, only serum CRP at 72 h postoperation and urinary uTi /Ucr at 24 h postoperation were the independent risk factors of FOOD. Conclusion: Age-related increasing proinflammatory postoperation may result in higher occurrence of FOOD in the elderly. Additionally, patients with extremely high concentrations of CRP in serum at 72 h postoperation and uTi /Ucr in urine at 24 h postoperation are more likely to experience FOOD, especially in the elderly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据