4.5 Article

Varenicline decreases nicotine self-administration and cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking behaviour in rats when a long pretreatment time is used

期刊

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1461145711001398

关键词

Cue-induced reinstatement; drug discrimination; nicotine; progressive ratio schedule; varenicline

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  2. Pfizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effects of varenicline (Champix), a nicotinic partial agonist, were evaluated on subjective effects of nicotine (drug discrimination), motivation for nicotine taking (progressive-ratio schedule of intravenous nicotine self-administration) and reinstatement (cue-induced reinstatement of previously extinguished nicotine-seeking behaviour). Effects on motor performance were assessed in rats trained to discriminate nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) from saline under a fixed-ratio (FR 10) schedule of food delivery and in rats trained to respond for food under a progressive-ratio schedule. At short pretreatment times (5-40 mm), varenicline produced full or high levels of partial generalization to nicotine's discriminative-stimulus effects and disrupted responding for food, while there were low levels of partial generalization and no disruption of responding for food at 2- or 4-h pretreatment times. Varenicline (1 and 3 mg/kg, 2-h pretreatment time) enhanced discrimination of low doses of nicotine and to a small extent decreased discrimination of the training dose of nicotine. It also dose-dependently decreased nicotine-taking behaviour, but had no effect on food-taking behaviour under progressive-ratio schedules. Finally, varenicline significantly reduced the ability of a nicotine-associated cue to reinstate extinguished nicotine-seeking behaviour. The ability of varenicline to reduce both nicotine-taking and nicotine-seeking behaviour can contribute to its relatively high efficacy in treating human smokers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据