4.5 Article

Large eddy simulation of polydisperse particles in turbulent coaxial jets using the direct quadrature method of moments

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 23-38

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.03.002

关键词

Large Eddy Simulation; Direct quadrature method of moments; Particles; Two-phase flow

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-NT0005015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modeling coal particles in turbulent coal flames is a challenging but nonetheless critical step for predicting flame characteristics. Traditional approaches such as Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) coupled with Lagrangian solvers are unable to correctly predict particle concentrations and velocities in complex systems. This study shows how Large Eddy Simulations (LES) coupled with an Eulerian solver can address those issues. Previous Direct Numerical Simulations and Stokes number analysis suggest that LES has the capabilities to resolve all the turbulent length scales affecting coal particles in a coal flame and could therefore lead to more accurate simulation. The effects of fluid aerodynamics on the particle motion in the near field region of non-reacting coaxial particle-laden jets were simulated using LES. The Direct Quadrature Method of Moments (DQMOM) was used to track the particle phase in an Eulerian framework. Simulation results were compared to experimental data and accurately modeled a wide range of particle behaviors, such as particle jet waviness, spreading, break up, particle clustering and segregation, in different conditions. Simulations also predicted the mean axial velocity along the centerline for both the gas phase and the solid phase with a maximum error of 12% relative to experimental data. This study therefore provides a solid validation of the LES with DQMOM approach to model particles in turbulent flows and justifies its use for coal flame simulations. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据