4.7 Review

Natural Bioactive Compounds from Winery By-Products as Health Promoters: A Review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 15638-15678

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms150915638

关键词

Vitis vinifera L.; grape pomace; phytochemicals; bioactivity; extraction; food industry; pharmaceutical; phenolic compounds

资金

  1. FCT-Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [PEst-OE/AGR/UI4033/2014]
  2. Project INNOFOOD-INNovation in the FOOD sector through valorization of food and agro-food by-products - North Portugal Regional Operational Programme [NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-0000029]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through CICYT project [AGL2011-23690]
  4. CYTED Program, CORNUCOPIA Thematic Network [192] [112RT0460]
  5. National Strategic Reference Framework (QREN), through European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relevance of food composition for human health has increased consumers' interest in the consumption of fruits and vegetables, as well as foods enriched in bioactive compounds and nutraceuticals. This fact has led to a growing attention of suppliers on reuse of agro-industrial wastes rich in healthy plant ingredients. On this matter, grape has been pointed out as a rich source of bioactive compounds. Currently, up to 210 million tons of grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) are produced annually, being the 15% of the produced grapes addressed to the wine-making industry. This socio-economic activity generates a large amount of solid waste (up to 30%, w/w of the material used). Winery wastes include biodegradable solids namely stems, skins, and seeds. Bioactive compounds from winery by-products have disclosed interesting health promoting activities both in vitro and in vivo. This is a comprehensive review on the phytochemicals present in winery by-products, extraction techniques, industrial uses, and biological activities demonstrated by their bioactive compounds concerning potential for human health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据