4.7 Article

Quinolinic Acid: Neurotoxin or Oxidative Stress Modulator?

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 21328-21338

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/ijms141121328

关键词

differential pulse voltammetry; Fenton reaction; hormesis; hydroxyl radical; inflammation; iron autoxidation; kynurenines; neuropathology; neurotoxicants; oxidative stress

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24630-B21]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 24630] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24630] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quinolinic acid (2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid, QUIN) is a well-known neurotoxin. Consequently, QUIN could produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS are generated in reactions catalyzed by transition metals, especially iron (Fe). QUIN can form coordination complexes with iron. A combination of differential pulse voltammetry, deoxyribose degradation and Fe(II) autoxidation assays was used for explorating ROS formation in redox reactions that are catalyzed by iron in QUIN-Fe complexes. Differential pulse voltammetry showed an anodic shift of the iron redox potential if iron was liganded by QUIN. In the H2O2/FeCl3/ascorbic acid variant of the deoxyribose degradation assay, the dose-response curve was U-shaped. In the FeCl3/ascorbic acid variant, QUIN unambiguously showed antioxidant effects. In the Fe(II) autoxidation assay, QUIN decreased the rate of ROS production caused by Fe(II) oxidation. Our study confirms that QUIN toxicity may be caused by ROS generation via the Fenton reaction. This, however, applies only for unnaturally high concentrations that were used in attempts to provide support for the neurotoxic effect. In lower concentrations, we show that by liganding iron, QUIN affects the Fe(II)/Fe(III) ratios that are beneficial to homeostasis. Our results support the notion that redox chemistry can contribute to explaining the hormetic dose-response effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据