4.7 Article

Enrichment of Polychlorinated Biphenyls from Aqueous Solutions Using Fe3O4 Grafted Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with Poly Dimethyl Diallyl Ammonium Chloride

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 6382-6398

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms13056382

关键词

Fe3O4 nanoparticles; MWCNTs; solid-phase extraction; polychorinated biphenyls; trace levels

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20805024]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [20040959, Y201016915, 2011C23126, Y3110478]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo [2011A610026]
  4. Social Development Project of Ningbo [2009D10010]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2010A030300006, 2008A050200006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, Fe3O4 nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) grafted carboxyl groups of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with cationic polyelectrolyte poly (dimethyldiallylammonium chloride) (PDDA) (MWCNTs-COO-/PDDA@Fe3O4), are successfully synthesized and used for the extraction of six kinds of major toxic polychorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from a large volume of water solution. The hydrophilicity of the PDDA cage can enhance the dispersibility of sorbents in water samples, and the superparamagnetism of the Fe3O4 NPs facilitate magnetic separation which directly led to the simplification of the extraction procedure. With the magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) technique based on the MWCNTs-COO-/PDDA@Fe3O4 sorbents, it requires only 30 min to extract trace levels of PCBs from 500 mL water samples. When the eluate condensed to 1.0 mL, concentration factors for PCBs became over 500. The spiked recoveries of several real water samples for PCBs were in the range of 73.3-98.9% with relative standard deviations varying from 3.8% to 9.4%, reflecting good accuracy of the method. Therefore, preconcentration of trace level of PCBs by using this MWCNTs-COO-/PDDA@Fe3O4 sorbent, which are stable for multiple reuses, from water solution can be performed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据