4.7 Article

Lewis y Regulate Cell Cycle Related Factors in Ovarian Carcinoma Cell RMG-I in Vitro via ERK and Akt Signaling Pathways

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 828-839

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms13010828

关键词

Lewis(y) antigen; cell cycle; cyclin; cyclin-dependent kinases; cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30571958, 81072118, 30872757]
  2. item of Educational Department Science foundation of Liaoning Province [20121268]
  3. item of Liaoning Natural Science foundation [20052107]
  4. item of Educational Department [20070159023]
  5. item of Educational Department Key Laboratory of Liaoning Province [2008S247]
  6. Shengjing Freedom researchers plan [200807]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24570141] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the effect of Lewis y overexpression on the expression of proliferation-related factors in ovarian cancer cells. Methods: mRNA levels of cyclins, CDKs, and CKIs were measured in cells before and after transfection with the alpha 1,2-fucosyltransferase gene by real-time PCR, and protein levels of cyclins, CDKs and CKIs were determined in cells before and after gene transfection by Western blot. Results: Lewis y overexpression led to an increase in both mRNA and protein expression levels of cyclin A, cyclin D1 and cyclin E in ovarian cancer cells, decrease in both mRNA and protein expression levels of p16 and p21, and decrease of p27 at only the protein expression level without change in its mRNA level. There were no differences in proteins and the mRNA levels of CDK2, CDK4 and CDK6 before and after gene transfection. Anti-Lewis y antibody, ERK and PI3K pathway inhibitors PD98059 and LY294002 reduced the difference in cyclin and CKI expression caused by Lewis y overexpression. Conclusion: Lewis y regulates the expression of cell cycle-related factors through ERK/MAPK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways to promote cell proliferation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据