4.7 Review

Biodegradable Metals for Cardiovascular Stent Application: Interests and New Opportunities

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 4250-4270

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms12074250

关键词

coronary stents; biodegradable stents; metallurgical processes; electroforming

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canadian Institute for Health Research of Canada
  3. Fonds Quebecois pour la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologie du Quebec
  4. Fonds de Recherche pour la Sante du Quebec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the last decade, biodegradable metallic stents have been developed and investigated as alternatives for the currently-used permanent cardiovascular stents. Degradable metallic materials could potentially replace corrosion-resistant metals currently used for stent application as it has been shown that the role of stenting is temporary and limited to a period of 6-12 months after implantation during which arterial remodeling and healing occur. Although corrosion is generally considered as a failure in metallurgy, the corrodibility of certain metals can be an advantage for their application as degradable implants. The candidate materials for such application should have mechanical properties ideally close to those of 316L stainless steel which is the gold standard material for stent application in order to provide mechanical support to diseased arteries. Non-toxicity of the metal itself and its degradation products is another requirement as the material is absorbed by blood and cells. Based on the mentioned requirements, iron-based and magnesium-based alloys have been the investigated candidates for biodegradable stents. This article reviews the recent developments in the design and evaluation of metallic materials for biodegradable stents. It also introduces the new metallurgical processes which could be applied for the production of metallic biodegradable stents and their effect on the properties of the produced metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据