4.2 Article

Agreement between self-reported and pharmacy data on medication use in the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/mpr.304

关键词

agreement; pharmacy data; questionnaire; register; reliability; self-report

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [113760, 125853, 212848]
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  4. Lundbeck Foundation
  5. Research Foundation of Orion Corporation
  6. Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas Foundation
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [113760, 125853, 212848, 113760, 125853, 212848] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare self-reported (SR) medication use and pharmacy data for major psychoactive medications and three classes of medications used for different indications, and to determine the socio-economic factors associated with the congruence. Methods: Postal questionnaire data collected in 1997 were compared with the register of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland on the reimbursed prescriptions purchased during 1997. Altogether 7625 subjects were included in this study. Drugs were categorized according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) system. Results: Kappa values were 0.77, 0.68, 0.84, 0.92 and 0.55 for antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, antidiabetics and beta-blocking agents, respectively. Prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa values were almost perfect (0.98-1.00). Reliability of antipsychotics use was better for married subjects than for those who were not married; and of antidepressants use for highly educated and married subjects than for those who were less educated and were not married. Altogether 414 (5.4%) responders and 285 (7.1%) non-responders had used at least one of the selected medications. Conclusion: Agreement between the SR and pharmacy data was moderate for psychoactive medication use. Even though data collected by postal questionnaire may underestimate the prevalence of medication use due to non-participation it can be assumed accurate enough for study purposes. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据