4.4 Review

Molecular diagnostics of sepsis - Where are we today?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.006

关键词

Transcriptomics; Proteomics; Nucleic acid amplification; Polymerase chain reaction; Infection; Critical care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid diagnosis of sepsis is of outstanding significance as each hour of delay of appropriate antimicrobial therapy increases mortality by 5-10%. As a result, antibiotics are started without a definitive microbial result based on clinical signs in concert with biomarkers with high sensitivity but a lack of specificity. Diagnostic uncertainty is compensated for by liberal use of broad spectrum antibiotics with inherent resistance as an increasing public-health problem. Blood culture reflects the current gold-standard but is positive only in approximately 20% of cases and even if positive, results are obtained too late to influence decision making. Culture-independent microbial nucleic acid amplification techniques may allow ways out of this dilemma. In addition to diagnosis of infection, biomarkers reflecting the host response can provide valuable information regarding prognosis, course, and response to treatment. Among available single protein markers, procalcitonin (PCT) covers these features best and a PCT-based therapeutic strategy carries potential to reduce antibiotic courses even in life-threatening infections. Recent data from transcriptomic and/or proteomic profiling would, however, indicate that marker panels derived from transcriptomic or proteomic profiling are superior to single proteins to differentiate non-infectious from sepsis-associated systemic inflammation. Multiplexed assay systems, e.g. after platform transfer from whole-genomic chips to multiplexed quantitative PCR are currently being developed with potential to improve sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility of both, molecular tests to identify the pathogen and the ensuing host response, has still to be evaluated in prospective trials. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据