4.4 Article

Differential roles of sortase-anchored surface proteins and wall teichoic acid in Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 298, 期 5-6, 页码 505-513

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.11.006

关键词

nasal carriage; wall teichoic acid; keratin; scavenger receptor; sortase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most of the severe bacterial infections originate from the endogenous microflora of human body surfaces. However, the molecular basis of colonization, e.g. of the human nose by Staphylococcus aureus, has remained incompletely understood. Several surface-exposed proteins and wall teichoic acid (WTA) polymers have previously been implicated in S. aureus attachment to nasal epithelial cells. Here we dissect the role of these molecules in colonization using S. aureus sortase A (srtA) and tagO mutants deficient in surface protein and WTA display, respectively. Although the two mutants were similarly affected in attachment to nasal cells they were abrogated in binding to different types of epithelial ligands. Surface protein sorting, but not WTA, were required for keratin- or fibronectin-mediated interactions while only WTA-mediated binding to nasal cells was effectively inhibited by polyinosinic acid, indicating a possible role of scavenger receptor-like molecules in WTA-dependent epithelial interactions. Both mutants exhibited profound colonization defects in a cotton rat nasal colonization model, albeit at different stages of colonization (> 90% reduced bacterial counts at 24 h or several days after inoculation with the tagO or srtA mutant, respectively). These data indicate that S. aureus nasal colonization is a multifactorial process with various ligands affecting initial colonization and prolonged persistence in different ways. Our studies should be useful in the development of new preventive and therapeutic strategies. (C) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据