4.7 Article

On adiabatic shear localized fracture during serrated chip evolution in high speed machining of hardened AISI 1045 steel

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.07.004

关键词

High speed machining; Adiabatic shear localized fracture; Serrated chip; Saturation limit; Fracture criterion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51175063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The occurrence of adiabatic shear localized fracture (ASLF) which is the final stage of adiabatic shear evolution usually leads to discontinuously short serrated chip with only a few segments joined together or even isolated segment formation. To develop a deep study on ASLF, damage evolution mechanism of ASLF in chip formation is investigated under optical microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) through high speed machining experiment of hardened AISI 1045 steel at a relatively high cutting speed. Considering the energy convergence during damage evolution in shear band, the theory model of ASLF in which adiabatic shear saturation limit and saturation degree are proposed as the ASLF criterion is built and compared with the experimental results. The quantitative influences of shear band properties, material properties and loading conditions on ASLF are also analyzed numerically. The results presented here show that complete ASLF in isolated segment formation is found above cutting speed of 1300 m/min. The mechanism of ASLF in isolated segment formation is a multi-damage evolution process (or ductile-brittle-ductile transition mechanism), including voids coalescence, crack propagation and even fusing. Thermal softening effect plays a significant role in the process of ASLF. A thinner shear band with larger specific heat and thermal conductivity under higher strain and strain rate more easily leads to ASLF. The proposed ASLF theory can effectively assess saturation limit and quantitatively in machining hardened AISI 1045 steel. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据