4.7 Article

The forming limit diagram of ferritic stainless steel sheets: Experiments and modeling

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.08.009

关键词

Forming limit diagram; Ferritic stainless steel sheets; Modified marciniak test; PMC model

资金

  1. POSCO
  2. World Class University (WCU) program through the National Research Foundation [R32-10147]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (ERC Program) [2012R1A5A1048294]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [R32-2012-000-10147-0, 2012R1A5A1051500] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The forming limit diagrams (FLDs) of two ferritic stainless steel sheets of thicknesses 1 and 0.1 mm were determined experimentally. For the 0.1 mm thick sheet, the modified Marciniak test and the conventional ASTM standard test were used for the FLD determination. However, the latter produced wrinkles and buckles on the sheet specimens and undesired fractures for some strain paths. The results showed that the modified Marciniak test is a more robust method for the FLD determination of thin sheet materials. Nevertheless, in spite of the issues associated with the ASTM standard test for the low thickness sheet, the FLDs determined by the two methods led to similar results. In addition to the experimental approach, the FLD was predicted using a modification of the Parmar-Mellor-Chakrabarty (PMC) model, which incorporates the effect of surface roughness. A non-quadratic anisotropic yield function, Yld2000-2d was implemented in this model to represent the anisotropy of the sheet metals. The FLD predicted with the conventional M-K (Marciniak-Kuczynski) and the modified PMC models were compared to the FLD determined experimentally. The FLD calculated with this modified model was in better agreement with the measured data than that computed with the M-K model for both thin and thick sheets. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据