4.3 Article

Analysis of phase dependent frequency shifts in simulated FTMS transients using the filter diagonalization method

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2012.06.010

关键词

FT-ICR MS; Orbitrap; Particle in cell simulation; Filter diagonalization method; Space charge; Isotopic beat

资金

  1. PIRE: A U.S.-Dutch Mass Spectrometry Consortium for Advanced Modeling and Biological Structure and Imaging Applications
  2. National Science Foundation Office of International Science and Engineering [OISE-730072]
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-1058913]
  4. Division Of Chemistry
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1058913] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Space-charge perturbs ion motion and affects mass accuracy in ion trapping mass spectrometers. In Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FTMS), both ion-ion and ion-image charge interactions have been examined by experiments and by multiparticle ion simulations using the particle-in-cell (PIC) approach, and the magnitude of observed frequency shifts as a function of ion number agrees with theoretical models. Frequency shifts due to ion-ion interactions have generally been treated in a time-integrated fashion, that is, for the duration of the transient signal. Aizikov and O'Connor have experimentally shown that there is a time-dependence for such interactions, with a periodicity that correlates to the beat period between isotope peaks. Here, we investigate such interactions using PIC simulations and the filter diagonalization method (FDM) for obtaining frequencies from very short durations of the transient. Periodic decreases in observed frequency correlate with ion clouds of isotope peaks coming into phase in their cyclotron orbit. A similar phenomenon is observed in the simulations of ion motion in an Orbitrap mass analyzer, corresponding to the axial motion of isotope groupings moving in and out of phase. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据