4.3 Article

Top-down high-resolution electron capture dissociation mass spectrometry for comprehensive characterization of post-translational modifications in Rhesus monkey cardiac troponin I

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 305, 期 2-3, 页码 95-102

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2010.09.007

关键词

Top-down mass spectrometry; Electron capture dissociation; Phosphorylation; Cardiac troponin I; Heart diseases

资金

  1. Wisconsin Partnership Fund for a Healthy Future
  2. American Heart Association [0735443Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Top-down high-resolution electron capture dissociation (ECD) mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful approach for comprehensive characterization of large proteins with labile post-translational modifications (PTMs). Phosphorylation of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a prominent determinant of cardiac function. Non-human primates (NHPs) are valuable models for biomedical research due to their genetic similarity to humans. To address the emerging need for in-depth understanding of NHP heart models, we have applied top-down high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry in conjugation with immunoaffinity chromatography purification to comprehensively characterize NHP cTnl. Our data revealed that cTnI affinity purified from NHP Rhesus monkey hearts was N-terminally acetylated and mono- or bis-phosphorylated. ECD unambiguously identified Ser22/Ser23 as the only basally phosphorylated sites with a phosphorylation order between these two sites (Ser23 phosphorylates prior to Ser22) which is different from those previously reported for mouse and human cTnl. Our study also strongly supports the nonergodic mechanism of ECD since no neutral loss of phosphates was observed in ECD spectra. Taken together, top-down MS with ECD is extremely valuable for studying labile PTMs in large proteins, which adds critical knowledge to our understanding of protein PTM regulations in health and disease. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据