4.3 Article

Characterization of simple isomeric oligosaccharides and the rapid separation of glycan mixtures by ion mobility mass spectrometry

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 298, 期 1-3, 页码 119-127

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2009.08.006

关键词

Ion mobility; Oligosaccharide; Glycan; Traveling wave

资金

  1. Department of Food and Rural Affairs, UK
  2. National Science Foundation, USA
  3. Oxford Glycobiology Institute
  4. Division Of Chemistry
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0909743] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ion mobility techniques, using both traveling wave-based technology and standard drift tube methods, along with molecular modeling were used to examine the gas-phase conformational properties of a series of isomeric oligosaccharides and hydrazine-released N-linked glycans from various sources. Electrospray ionization was used to generate H+ and Na+ adducts of oligosaccharides as well as Na+ and H2PO4- adducts of released N-linked glycans. The ion mobility mass spectrometry techniques were used to separate the isomeric oligosaccharides and the glycan mixtures. Good agreement was obtained between the theoretical and measured collision cross-sections. Glycans common to each glycoprotein were observed to have the same arrival time distribution independent of their source. In some cases support for multiple isomers was observed which correlated well with evidence obtained, where possible, from other experimental techniques. The sensitivity of the traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS) technique, together with the rapid experimental timescale, reproducibility and high information content make this an attractive approach for the characterization of complex mixtures of glycans released from glycoproteins. Successful calibration of the TWIMS arrival times/cross-sections was demonstrated using data from the drift tube instrument. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据