期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 581-607出版社
WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S021962200900351X
关键词
Nuclear waste repository; participative approach; group decision making; multiple criteria decision analysis; evidential reasoning approach
类别
资金
- UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/F024606/01]
- Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [70540430127, 70631003]
Two technically feasible nuclear waste repository options have been identified in Belgium. To select one for implementation, a study was carried out to compare the public perception and acceptance of the two options. In this paper, it is described how the study and selection process can be supported, and how the diversity and uncertainty in public opinions can be rationally modeled and analyzed by applying the Evidential Reasoning (ER) approach. The ER approach is a recent advancement for multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). By using belief decision matrices to model MCDA problems, both qualitative and quantitative information with various types of uncertainties can be taken into account in decision-making processes in a unified and logical format. Following an illustration of the ER approach and an outline of the selection problem, it is described how the ER approach can be used to model the problem, aggregate information, and facilitate sensitivity analysis. Some suggestions are made for future assessment studies.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据