4.7 Article

The benign nature of acute dengue infection in hospitalized older adults in Singapore

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 E410-E413

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.06.026

关键词

Adults; Dengue; Dengue hemorrhagic fever; Geriatric; Morbidity

资金

  1. National Healthcare Group [SIG/05048]
  2. National Medical Research Council [NMRC/1006/2005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: In Singapore, dengue primarily affects adults. This study aimed to determine if older dengue patients in Singapore have greater morbidity and mortality. Methods: All laboratory diagnosed dengue patients admitted to Tan Tock Seng Hospital in 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were re-classified into dengue fever and dengue hemorrhagic fever based on World Health Organization criteria. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and outcome data of patients aged >= 60 years and <60 years were collected. Results: Of 1971 laboratory confirmed dengue cases, 66 were aged >= 60 years. Older patients were significantly less likely to be male (44% vs. 64%), and more likely to have diabetes (17% vs. 2%), hypertension (48% vs. 4%), ischemic heart disease (6% vs. 0.1%), hyperlipidemia (18% vs. 1%), and secondary dengue infections (64% vs. 34%). Clinical features were similar except older patients were significantly less likely to report fever (92% vs. 99%), or have leukopenia (32% vs. 51%) or hemoconcentration (0 vs. 5%) on admission. Older patients had similar dengue hemorrhagic fever, bleeding, hypotension, severe thrombocytopenia, and elevated transaminase rates. Length of hospital stay, risk of intensive care unit admission, and outcome of death were not statistically different. Conclusions: Despite greater co-morbidity and secondary dengue infection, older dengue patients in Singapore did not have greater morbidity or mortality. (C) 2009 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据