4.7 Article

Dynamic responses of buried arch structure subjected to subsurface localized impulsive loading: Experimental study

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.11.004

关键词

Buried arch structure; Structural model experiment; Subsurface localized explosion; Dynamic response; Collapse mode

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [51078351, 51308544]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundations of China [51021001]
  3. Natural Science Foundations of Jiangsu Province [BK2011741]
  4. China Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A structural model experiment was carried out on a buried scaled-down reinforced-concrete arch structure subjected to underground close-in explosions. The aim of the experiment is to provide believable results of dynamic responses of large-span structures, including the dynamic loads, deflections, strains and failure modes. To achieve this objective, blast experiments were carried out under 0.6 kg, 3 kg, 6 kg and 17.4 kg TNT charges, respectively. Distribution laws of the applied dynamic loads, deflections, strains, accelerations and the failure modes of the arch were revealed. Different from the quasi-uniform distribution style subjected to far-field explosions, the dynamic loads applied on the buried arch subjected to close-in explosions have tense local effects and render a triangle-like distribution style. According to the tested deformations and strains, it can be concluded that subjected to close-in explosions, the buried arch deforms at a dominant flexural mode, companying with compression mode. Spalling, tensile cracks and shear failures of the concrete and yielding of the steel bars are the main failure modes of the blast-loaded arch. The arch will collapse after four or five plastic hinge lines formed. The experimental data are helpful for engineers and well support further theoretical analysis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据