4.4 Article

Exploration of MR-guided head and neck hyperthermia by phantom testing of a modified prototype applicator for use with proton resonance frequency shift thermometry

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 184-191

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2014.910615

关键词

Experimental; head and neck; modelling (electromagnetism, heat transfer, integrated; treatment planning, ultrasound); non-invasive thermometry; radiofrequency/microwave

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [EMCR2012-5472]
  2. Technology Foundation Stichting Technische Wetenschappen (STW) [11195]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) offers non-invasive temperature imaging and can greatly contribute to the effectiveness of head and neck hyperthermia. We therefore wish to redesign the HYPERcollar head and neck hyperthermia applicator for simultaneous radio frequency (RF) heating and magnetic resonance thermometry. In this work we tested the feasibility of this goal through an exploratory experiment, in which we used a minimally modified applicator prototype to heat a neck model phantom and used an MR scanner to measure its temperature distribution. We identified several distorting factors of our current applicator design and experimental methods to be addressed during development of a fully MR compatible applicator. To allow MR imaging of the electromagnetically shielded inside of the applicator, only the lower half of the HYPERcollar prototype was used. Two of its antennas radiated a microwave signal (150 W, 434 MHz) for 11 min into the phantom, creating a high gradient temperature profile (Delta T-max = 5.35 degrees C). Thermal distributions were measured sequentially, using drift corrected proton resonance frequency shift-based MRT. Measurement accuracy was assessed using optical probe thermometry and found to be about 0.4 degrees C (0.1-0.7 degrees C). Thermal distribution size and shape were verified by thermal simulations and found to have a good correlation (r(2) = 0.76).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据