4.4 Article

Structural parameters governing activity of Pluronic triblock copolymers in hyperthermia cancer therapy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 663-671

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2011.599828

关键词

colorectal adenocarcinoma; hyperthermia therapy; pluronic triblock copolymer; radiofrequency ablation; thermosensitiser

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01CA118399, R01CA136857]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA118399, R01CA136857] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To identify specific Pluronic triblock copolymer structural properties which are critical to its function as a sensitiser in hyperthermia treatment of experimental colorectal adenocarcinoma. Materials and methods: DHD/K12/TRb rat colorectal adenocarcinoma cells were exposed to Pluronics, a family of triblock copolymers with the general structure EOx-POy-EOx (EO: ethylene oxide, and PO: propylene oxide), at a range of molecular weights (Mw) and EO:PO:EO sub-unit lengths and then submitted to sublethal heat (43 degrees C) treatment. Outcomes indicating Pluronic performance as a thermal sensitiser were correlated with its structural properties; lead candidates were determined accordingly. Finally, one of the lead candidates, Pluronic L61, a 2000 Da copolymer, was used to assess sensitising functionality in vivo in a subcutaneous rat model of colorectal carcinoma. Results: Pluronics with 1100 <= Mw <= 3200 Da and hydrophilic lipophilic balance (HLB) between 1-8 demonstrated the highest thermosensitising ability. Pluronics L31, L61, L62, L10 and L64 were found to be among the most effective copolymers for hyperthermia sensitisation under tested conditions. Most encouraging, L61 in synergy with hyperthermia significantly reduced tumour growth progression in vivo compared to tumours treated with hyperthermia alone. Conclusions: Pluronic copolymer structure properties including, Mw, HLB and PO length are essential to its hyperthermia sensitising function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据