4.7 Article

Mass transport limitation in inlet periphery of fuel cells: Studied on a planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 43, 期 36, 页码 17420-17430

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.030

关键词

Modeling; Mass transport; Inlet periphery; Planar; SOFC

资金

  1. JSPS [17F17069]
  2. JSPS (Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17F17069] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It was recently clarified on a microtubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) that the range of mass transport limitation might commence from the inlet periphery (inlet opening and inlet pipe), i.e., the concentration gradient of reactants may extend inward the inlet periphery. For demonstrating that this phenomenon occurs regardless of the form and type of the fuel cell operating at high reactant utilization rate, herein we investigate the mass transport in the anode side of a one-cell stack of a planar SOFC. The investigation leans upon experimental and numerical data analyzed from both conventional (non spatial) and spatial perspectives. The experimental data were spatially obtained in the lateral direction by applying the segmentation method. Regarding analyses let us to confirm that mass transport limitation occurs in the inlet periphery of the planar stack. Besides, the critical ratio of the consumed/supplied mass fluxes of hydrogen is valid for assessing whether the concentration gradient of hydrogen extends inward the inlet periphery. Furthermore, the virtual inlet opening is useful for accurately calculating the mass transport within the active field of the stack via hypothetically preventing the mass transport limitation in the inlet periphery. These findings are expected to help researchers and engineers for accurately designing and characterizing fuel cell systems at varying scales from cells to stacks. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据