期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 39, 期 14, 页码 7173-7189出版社
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.018
关键词
Large-eddy simulation; Linear-eddy model; Eddy diffusivity; Scalar transport; Hydrogen; Counter-gradient diffusion
资金
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G062714/2]
- UK Turbulence Consortium [EP/G069581/1, EP/G069735/1]
- EPSRC [EP/G062714/1, EP/G069735/1, EP/G062714/2, EP/G069581/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G062714/1, EP/G062714/2, EP/G069735/1, EP/G069581/1] Funding Source: researchfish
A comparison of two different models addressing the scalar transport in large-eddy simulations is conducted for a non-reacting jet and an experimental flame. A simple approach based on a gradient diffusion closure is compared against the linear-eddy model in the context of hydrogen-enriched non-reacting fuel jets and flames burning hydrogen-enriched mixtures. The results show that the gradient diffusion model is not valid as a subgrid scale model for large-eddy simulations of mixtures containing hydrogen. It produces unphysical scalar fields with unrealistic temperature distributions. Approaches based on the linear-eddy model can be used instead to obtain appropriate representation of the scalar field and more accurate predictions of the scalar transport and the temperature field. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据