4.7 Article

Influence of coating conditions on the H2 separation performance from H2/CH4 gas mixtures by the PDMS/PEI composite membrane

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 6588-6597

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.009

关键词

PDMS/PEI composite membrane; H-2/CH4 separation; Coating method; Permselectivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, the composite polyetherimide (PEI) membrane coated with poly dimethyl siloxane (PDMS) was synthesized and optimum conditions of coating were obtained for separation of hydrogen from methane. Three coating techniques pouring solution inclined by 45 degrees, film casting and dip-coating were used. The effect of sequential coating for different methods on permselectivity of the membranes was investigated. In addition, the influences of coating conditions including coating solution concentration, coating and curing temperatures were examined. The results showed that when the concentration of PDMS coating solution was increased; the permeance of H-2 was initially declined rapidly and was then gradually leveled off. The optimum concentration of coating solution was 15 wt.%. The examination of the curing and coating temperatures showed no significant effect on H-2 permeance and selectivity. In the dip coating method, two times coating showed superior permeance and selectivity and in film casting, the performance of triple coating was promising. Higher selectivities for the composite membrane prepared by dip-coating introduced this method as the best method. The sequential dip-coating with different PDMS concentrations was applied and the selectivity was enhanced significantly from 26 to 96 for pure gases and from 22 to 70 for the binary gas mixture. Finally, the influence of pressure on the separation performance of the fabricated membrane was investigated. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据