4.7 Article

Synergistic effect of Cu2O/TiO2 heterostructure nanoparticle and its high H2 evolution activity

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 6345-6353

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.209

关键词

Cu2O/TiO2; Cu2O/Cu/TiO2; Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution; Photocatalyst

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21173077, 21377038, 21237003]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB732306, 2013CB632403]
  3. Project of International Cooperation of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011DFA50530]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [12230705000, 12XD1402200]
  5. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120074130001]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cu2O/TiO2 nanoparticles were prepared by solvothermal method, which formed the heterostructure of Cu2O/TiO2. Due to the heterostructure, the H-2 evolution rate under simulated solar irradiation was increasingly promoted. Meanwhile a certain amount of Cu particles which were confirmed by Transmission Electro Microscopy (TEM) and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), formed on the surface of Cu2O/TiO2, and the photoactivity was accordingly further enhanced. The stabilized activity was maintained after many times irradiation. It is interesting that after a few hours irradiation the amount of Cu particles on the surface kept unchanged in the presence of Cu2O and TiO2. The Cu particles that formed during hydrogen generation reaction play a key role in the further enhancement of the hydrogen production activity. In this study, it is the first time to study the details on the formation of the stable ternary structure under simulated solar irradiation and their synergistic effect on the photoactivity of the water splitting. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据