4.7 Article

Enhancement of hydrogen production and power density in a bio-reformed formic acid fuel cell (BrFAFC) using genetically modified Enterobacter asburiae SNU-1

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 39, 期 22, 页码 11731-11737

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.117

关键词

Enterobacter asburiae SNU-1; Hydrogen production; Formate hydrogen lyase (FHL); Cell autolysis; Bio-reformed formic acid fuel cell (BrFAFC)

资金

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation - Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [R32-2009-000-10213-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this research was to enhance hydrogen production and power density of a bio-reformed fuel cell (BrFAFC) in the fermentative hydrogen-producing bacterium, Enterobacter asburiae SNU-1, by genetic manipulation and treatment for cell stability. At certain formate concentrations and pHs, formate hydrogen lyase (FHL) decomposes formate to hydrogen and CO2. FHL is expressed by the FhlA transcription activator. Consequently, over-expressing the fhlA gene will increase FHL activity. We tested hydrogen productivity in peptone-yeast extract-glucose (PYG) growth medium and in formate production medium using fhlA over-expressed E. asburiae SNU-1 and found that specific hydrogen production was enhanced by 36.89% and 56.28%, respectively. Using a 25 mM optimized concentration of MgSO4, cell autolysis, which impedes hydrogen production in formic acid media, decreased; therefore, hydrogen production increased by 18%. A BrFAFC performance test was conducted in 300 mM formic acid containing 25 mM MgSO4. The BrFAFC using fhlA over-expressed SNU-1 as a cell catalyst for hydrogen production showed similar fuel cell performance up to 0.6 V compared to that of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell supplying pure H-2 gas, and also generated a two-fold maximum power density than that using the SNU-1wild type. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据