4.7 Article

Strategies to enhance dry reforming of methane: Synthesis of ceria-zirconia/nickel-cobalt catalysts by freeze-drying and NO calcination

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 39, 期 24, 页码 12636-12647

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.083

关键词

Ceria-zirconia support; Dry reforming of methane; Freeze-drying; Nickel-cobalt bimetallic catalyst; NO calcination

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia [P2-0150]
  2. National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the activity of nickel-cobalt (NiCo) catalyst supported on ceria-zirconia (CeZr) in the dry reforming of methane (DRM) with carbon dioxide, and to lower the coking rate in this process, 1.5 wt.% and 2.5 wt.% NiCo catalysts were prepared using two approaches, i.e. freeze-drying (FD) and NO calcination for comparison against oven-drying (OD) and air calcination (air), respectively. Their impact was studied for 20 h of DRM at 750 degrees C and 1.2 bar, with undiluted CH4-CO2 feed simulating the real conditions. NO-calcined samples show, on average, more pronounced improvement through increased conversion of CH4 (90%), followed by FD samples (85%) from the air and OD-prepared samples (both 82%). Coking content varied between 0.67 and 0.82 wt.%. The observed slow catalyst deactivation might be caused by sintering of the catalysts. Higher quantity of CO than H-2 for syngas production was obtained, owing to concurrent reverse water-gas shift side reaction, and high redox properties of the defective CeZr lattice that enabled surface carbon gasification by continuous replenishment of oxygen from the support to produce CO, of which the latter phenomenon also explains the low carbon deposition. H-2/CO ratio between 0.42 and 0.85 was achieved, with FD and NO samples fared better (0.83-0.85) over the ones prepared by conventional methods (0.73-0.82) for 2.5%NiCo loaded catalysts. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据