4.7 Article

Steam reforming of toluene as a biomass tar model compound over CeO2 promoted Ni/CaO-Al2O3 catalytic systems

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 38, 期 32, 页码 13938-13949

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.029

关键词

Biomass tar; Steam reforming of toluene; Ni/Ca-Al-Ce; Promotional effect of CeO2; Ni reducibility

资金

  1. National University of Singapore
  2. National Environmental Agency (NEA-ETRP) [1002114]
  3. National Environmental Agency (RP) [279-000-333-490]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steam reforming of toluene as a biomass tar model compound was performed over Ni supported CaO-Al2O3 (Ca-Al) and CeO2 promoted CaO-Al2O3 (Ca-Al-Ce) catalysts to explore promotional effect of CeO2 on Ca-Al support. Among all the catalysts tested, Ni/Ca-Al-Ce(0.2) catalyst gave superior catalytic performance over other catalysts. The basic strength of catalytic supports measured by CO2 TPD and Hammett indicator methods indicates Ca-Al-Ce(0.2) support has higher surface basicity and base strength compared to Ca-Al and other Ca-Al-Ce(x) supports. Furthermore, CO pulse chemisorption results showed that Ni/Ca-Al-Ce(0.2) catalyst has a higher amount of surface metallic nickel compared to other Ni/Ca-Al-Ce catalysts. TPR analysis reveals that the redox property of CeO2 can enhance the reducibility of supported nickel species, which is further confirmed using XPS analysis, where addition of CeO2 enhanced the interaction of Ni species with Ce by reducing the interaction of Ni species with the Al support, resulting in the formation of Ni rich surface. However, formation of bulk NiO species was also observed for the catalyst having higher amount of CeO2. TGA analysis on spent catalysts reveals that all CeO2-containing catalysts generally result in lower carbon formation rates as compared to Ni/Ca-Al catalyst. Copyright (C) 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据