4.7 Article

Power generation of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) with low cathodic platinum loading

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 692-700

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.104

关键词

Microbial fuel cell; Platinum loading; Solution conductivity; Power generation; COD removal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims at investigating the effects of platinum (Pt) loadings on the cathodic reactions in Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cells (SCMFCs) and developing cost-effective MFC operational protocols. The power generation of SCMFCs was examined with different Pt loadings (0.005-1 mgPt/cm(2)) on cathodes. The results showed that the power generation of the SCMFCs with 0.5-1 mgPt/cm(2) were the highest in the tests, decreased 10 -15% at 0.01-0.25 mgPt/cm(2), and decreased further 10-15% at 0.005 mgPt/cm(2). The SCMFCs with Pt-free cathode (graphite) had the lowest power generation. In addition, the power generation of SCMFCs with different Pt loadings were compared in raw wastewater (Chemical oxygen demand (COD): 0.36 g/L) and wastewater enriched with sodium acetate (COD: 2.95 g/L). The solution conductivity in SCMFCs decreased with the degradation of organic substrates. Daily polarization curves (V I) showed a decrease in current generation and an increase in ohmic losses over the operational period (8 days). The SCMFCs (with 0.5-1 mgPt/cm(2) at cathode) fed with wastewater and sodium acetate (NaOAc) reached the highest power generation (786 mW/m(2)), while the SCMFCs (with 0.5-1 mgPt/cm(2) at cathode) fed only with wastewater obtained the lower power generation (81 mW/m(2)). The study demonstrated that lowering the Pt loadings in two magnitude orders (1 to 0.01, 0.5 to 0.005 mgPt/cm(2)) only reduced the power generation of 15-30%, and this reduction of the power generation become less substantial with the decrease in the solution conductivity of SCMFCs. Copyright 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据