4.7 Article

Development of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ cathode with an improved stability via La0.8Sr0.2MnO3-film impregnation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 38, 期 13, 页码 5375-5382

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.091

关键词

SOFC cathodes; LSM; LSCF; Sol-gel; Epitaxial film; Aqueous solution

资金

  1. DOE SECA Core Technology Program [DE-NT0006557]
  2. HetroFoaM Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001061]
  4. Foundation of Harbin Institute of Technology [HIT.NSRIF.2013088]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of China [21206023]
  6. [LBH-Z12088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uniform, dense and continuous coatings of La0.8Sr0.2MnO3-delta (LSM) have been successfully deposited on dense/porous La0.6Sr0.4CO0 2Fe0.8O3-delta (LSCF) substrates via a one-step drop-coating process using a water-based solution in order to improve the operating stability of solid oxide fuel cell cathode. The processing conditions were optimized by precise control of the composition of infiltrating solution, including chelating agents (glycine, citric acid and ethylene glycol), surfactants (polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyethylene glycol (PEG) and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP)) and pH values (5.25, 4.29, 3.01 and 2.09). Ethanol was found to improve the wetting ability of the water-based solution significantly, but unfortunately causing precipitation. The symmetrical and full cells tests demonstrated that both performance and stability of LSCF cathode can be enhanced by surface modification with an optimized LSM film coating, leading to similar to 31% reduction in cathodic polarization resistance and similar to 45% improvement in power density (without observable degradation) for almost 350 h operation at 750 degrees C under a constant voltage of 0.7 V. Copyright (C) 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据