4.7 Article

Gas diffusion layer deformation and its effect on the transport characteristics and performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 38, 期 29, 页码 12891-12903

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.150

关键词

Proton exchange membrane fuel cell; Gas diffusion layer; Assembly force; Deformation; Water transport; Performance

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB215500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276121]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (China) [12JCYBJC30500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell/stack assembly force can strongly affect the transport characteristics and performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) through causing the structural deformation. In this study, a mathematical model has been developed to investigate the effect of the assembly force for different gas diffusion layers (GDL) and membranes. The results indicate that the predominant deformation of the cell structure occurs in the porous GDL due to its weak mechanical strength. Thicker GDLs result into lower water content in the GDL structure, and can sustain a larger assembly force without the risk of electrode flooding; while thinner GDLs have higher water content, can maintain the hydration required for the membrane, and yield a better cell performance with less sensitivity to the variations in the assembly force. Thinner membranes yield better cell performance, but the cell performance is more sensitive to the changes in the assembly force. A combination of thin GDL and membrane is beneficial for better cell performance with reasonable sensitivity to the assembly force. For thinner GDLs, an optimal assembly force exists beyond which the cell performance is reduced; and practical cell assembly force will limit the GDL thickness. Copyright (C) 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据