4.7 Article

A combined theoretical and experimental analysis on transient breakthroughs of C2H6/C2H4 in fixed beds packed with ZIF-7

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 55-65

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.01.019

关键词

Metal-organic frameworks; ZIF-7; Light alkene and alkane separation; Adsorption-based separation; Breakthrough simulations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21036006, 21303165, 21476214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The selective separation of C2H6/C2H4 mixtures can be achieved by the zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-7, which is a well-known flexible microporous material due to its gate-opening effect in response to external stimuli such as pressure and temperature. Transient breakthrough experiments with C2H6/C2H4 mixtures were carried out at varying pressure and temperature conditions to confirm the potential application of ZIF-7 to selectively adsorb the saturated alkane and reject the unsaturated alkene in the gas phase during the adsorption cycle. Transient breakthrough simulations, including the influence of intra-crystalline diffusion, were compared with the experimental breakthroughs. The assumption of negligible diffusional limitations is able to capture the essential characteristics of the experimental breakthroughs. With the breakthroughs from both experiments and simulations, the adsorbed amounts of C2H6 and C2H4 in ZIF-7 were calculated to estimate the separation selectivity, which is in reasonable agreement with ideal adsorbed solution theory calculations. The derived isosteric heats of adsorption for both adsorbates are compared and used to explain the adsorption selectivity for C2H6 over C2H4 in ZIF-7. The good agreement between experiments and simulations verifies that the simulation methodology employed in the current study is a valuable and efficient tool for modeling the separation performance of C2H6/C2H4 mixtures in ZIF-7. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据