4.7 Article

Steam reforming of n-heptane for production of hydrogen and syngas

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 861-869

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.081

关键词

Heptane reforming; Hydrogen; Membrane reactor; Modeling and simulation; Syngas

资金

  1. King Saud University, College of Engineering Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous production of hydrogen and syngas from the catalytic reforming of n-heptane in circulating fast fluidized bed reactors (CFFBR) and circulating fast fluidized bed membrane reactors (CFFBMR) is investigated. This paper presents modeling and simulation approach for the analysis of these reformers. Complete conversion of heptane (100%) is attained at high steam to carbon feed ratios and shorter reactor lengths by both configurations. However, the CFFBMR is very efficient in hydrogen production and can produce exit hydrogen yield up to 473.14% higher than the CFFBR. It was found that operating the CFFBMR at the optimal conditions results in a minimum value of hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio (H-2/CO) within the recommended practical range for the syngas used as a feedstock for the gas to liquid processes (GTL). The results of the sensitivity analysis conducted for the CFFBMR has shown that the reaction side pressure and the feed temperature have significant effects on increasing the heptane conversion (up to 100%) and the temperature effect is stronger than the reaction side pressure effect. Considerable improvement in the hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio (H-2/CO) has been achieved by increasing the reaction side pressure, while the high feed temperature has negative effect on this ratio. It seems that the practical range of H-2/CO ratio can be achieved by controlling the reformer length and the right combinations of the operating conditions. Copyright (C) 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据