4.7 Article

Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis synthesis of Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite photocatalysts for simultaneous H2 production and CO2 reduction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 37, 期 13, 页码 9967-9976

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.003

关键词

H-2 production; CO2 reduction; Syngas; Solar energy; Photocatalysis; Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis

资金

  1. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) Research Foundation
  2. American Chemical Society - Petroleum Research Fund (ACS-PRF) [50631-DNI10]
  3. UWM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous photocatalytic hydrogen production and CO2 reduction (to form CO and CH4) from water using methanol as a hole scavenger were investigated using silver-modified TiO2 (Ag/TiO2) nanocomposite catalysts. A simple ultrasonic spray pyrolysis (SP) method was used to prepare mesoporous Ag/TiO2 composite particles using TiO2 (P25) and AgNO3 as the precursors. The material properties and photocatalytic activities were compared with those prepared by a conventional wet-impregnation (WI) method. It was found that the samples prepared by the SP method had a larger specific surface area and a better dispersion of Ag nanoparticles on TiO2 than those prepared by the WI method, and as a result, the SP samples showed much higher photocatalytic activities toward H-2 production and CO2 reduction. The optimal Ag concentration on TiO2 was found to be 2 wt%. The H-2 production rate of the 2% Ag/TiO2 SP sample exhibited a six-fold enhancement compared with the 2% Ag/TiO2 WI sample and a sixty-fold enhancement compared with bare TiO2. The molar ratio of H-2 and CO in the final products can be tuned in the range from 2 to 10 by varying the reaction gas composition, suggesting a viable way of producing syngas (a mixture of H-2 and CO) from CO2 and water using the prepared Ag/TiO2 catalysts with energy input from the sun. Copyright (C) 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据