4.7 Article

Bio-cathode materials evaluation in microbial fuel cells: A comparison of graphite felt, carbon paper and stainless steel mesh materials

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 37, 期 22, 页码 16935-16942

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.064

关键词

Microbial fuel cell; Biocathode; Graphite felt; Carbon paper; Stainless steel mesh

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [20977032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The choice of the cathode material is crucial for every bio-cathode microbial fuel cell (MFC) setup. The commonly used biocathode materials, Graphite felt (GF), carbon paper (CP) and stainless steel mesh (SSM) were compared and evaluated in terms of current density, power density, and polarization. The maximum current density and power density of the MFC with GF-biocathode achieved 350 mA m(-2) and 109.5 mW m(-2), which were higher than that of the MFC with CP-biocathode (210 mA m(-2) and 32.7 mW m(-2)) and the MFC with SSM-biocathode (18 mA m(-2) and 3.1 mW m(-2)). The polarization indicated that the biocathode was the limiting factor for the three MFC reactors. Moreover, cyclic voltammetry (CV) showed that the microorganisms on the biocathode played a major role in oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) for GF- and CP-biocathode but SSM-biocathode. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy suggested that GF biocathode performed better catalytic activity toward ORR than that of CP- and SSM-biocathode, also supported by CV test. Additionally, the MFC with GF-biocathode had the highest Coulombic Efficiency. The results of this study demonstrated GF was the most suitable biocathode for MFCs application among the three types of materials when using anaerobic sludge as inoculums. Copyright (c) 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据