4.7 Article

Hydrogen production through the aqueous phase reforming of ethylene glycol over supported Pt-based bimetallic catalysts

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 37, 期 10, 页码 8310-8317

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.160

关键词

Aqueous phase reforming; Pt-Mn bimetal; Carbon support; Hydrogen; Ethylene glycol

资金

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) of Korea [10033099]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10033099] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic activities of supported Pt-based bimetallic catalysts (Pt-M) were studied for hydrogen production via aqueous phase reforming (APR) using a 10 wt% ethylene glycol solution. The catalysts and supports used were characterized via X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), nitrogen adsorption-desorption, CO chemisorption, and temperature programmed reduction (TPR) techniques. It was found that the Pt-Mn (Pt:Mn = 1:1, molar ratio) bimetallic catalyst significantly enhanced the catalytic performances such as the hydrogen yield and hydrogen production when compared with monometallic catalysts and other bimetallic catalysts that were examined. The XRD and TPR studies confirmed the interaction between the Pt and Mn species, leading to the Pt-Mn alloys supported on CMK-3. Related to the effect of the type of support, the CMK-3 support demonstrated better performance than the commercial activated carbon and alumina. Accordingly, it can be understood that the better catalytic performance of the APR reaction over Pt-Mn/CMK-3 catalyst is dependent on the alloy effect as well as the structural properties and nature of support given by the addition of the second metal. Copyright (C) 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据