4.7 Article

Effect of initial pH, nutrients and temperature on hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent using thermotolerant consortia and corresponding microbial communities

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 37, 期 18, 页码 13806-13814

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.151

关键词

Biohydrogen; Palm oil mill effluent; Optimization; Thermotolerant consortia; Microbial community

资金

  1. Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand
  2. Research Group for the Development of Microbial Hydrogen Production Processes from Biomass, Office of the Higher Education Commission
  3. Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermotolerant consortia were obtained by heat-shock treatment on seed sludge from palm oil mill. Effect of the initial pH (4.5-6.5) on fermentative hydrogen production palm oil mill effluent (POME) showed the optimum pH at 6.0, with the maximum hydrogen production potential of 702.52 rnL/L-POME, production rate of 74.54 mL/L/h. Nutrients optimization was investigated by response surface methodology with central composite design (CCD). The optimum nutrients contained 0.25 g urea/L, 0.02 g Na2HPO4/L and 0.36 g FeSO4 center dot 7H(2)O/L, giving the predicted value of hydrogen production of 1075 mL/L-POME. Validation experiment revealed the actual hydrogen production of 968 mL/L-POME. Studies on the effect of temperature (25-55 degrees C) revealed that the maximum hydrogen production potential (985.3 mL/L-POME), hydrogen production rate (75.99 mL/L/h) and hydrogen yield (27.09 mL/g COD), were achieved at 55, 45 and 37 degrees C, respectively. Corresponding microbial community determined by the DGGE profile demonstrated that Clostridium spp. was the dominant species. Clostridium paraputrificum was the only dominant bacterium presented in all temperatures tested, indicating that the strain was thermotolerant. Copyright (C) 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据