4.7 Article

Carbon nanostructures as catalyst for improving the hydrogen storage behavior of sodium aluminum hydride

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 2750-2755

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.006

关键词

Complex hydrides; Carbon nanostructures; Catalysts; Temperature programmed desorption

资金

  1. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy
  2. University Grants Commission
  3. DST: Nano Science Technology Unit (BHU)
  4. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present paper reports the catalytic effect of carbon nanomaterials, particularly carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphitic nanofibres (GNFs) with two different structure morphology, namely planar GNFs (PGNFs) and helical GNFs (HGNFs) as the catalyst for improving the dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation behavior of sodium aluminum hydride (NaAlH4). It has been observed that HGNFs posses superior catalytic activity than other carbon nanoforms in improving the desorption kinetics and decreasing the desorption temperature of NaAlH4. Temperature programmed desorption (TPD) reveals that HGNFs admixed NaAlH4 undergo hydrogen desorption at a much lower temperature than PGNFs and CNTs (SWCNTs and MWCNTs) admixed NaAlH4. Thus for the heating rate of 2 degrees C/min, the peak desorption temperature corresponds to initial step decomposition of NaAlH4 admixed with 2 wt.% HGNFs and 2 wt.% PGNFs has been lowered to 143.6 degrees C and 152.6 degrees C, respectively (for pristine NaAlH4, it is similar to 170 degrees C). In addition to the enhancement in desorption kinetics, the HGNFs admixed NaAlH4 undergoes fast rehydrogenation at the moderate condition. Microstructural investigation reveals that the HGNFs were present on the surface of NaAlH4 grains, whereas CNTs were tunneled into the grains of NaAlH4 suggesting a distinct catalytic behavior of different carbon nanovariants. Copyright (C) 2011, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据