4.7 Article

Mechanism of wet sewage sludge pyrolysis in a tubular furnace

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 355-363

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.100

关键词

Wet sewage sludge; Pyrolysis; Mechanism; GC-MS; FTIR

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20876066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main objective of this work was to develop a preliminary mechanistic understanding of wet sewage sludge decomposition from starting constituents to final products, including intermediates formed during the pyrolysis process. Sewage sludge with a moisture content of 84.2 wt% was pyrolyzed at different temperatures in a tubular furnace, the pyrolysis products (hydrogen-rich fuel gas, tar and solid char) were detected by micro-GC, GC-MS, and FTIR, respectively. The high moisture content of wet sewage sludge generated a steam-rich atmosphere at high temperatures, leading to an in situ steam reforming of the volatile compounds and a partial gasification of the solid char, which contributed to the production of hydrogen-rich fuel gas. The pyrolysis process can be divided into two steps: at a relatively low temperature (< 600 degrees C), the breaking of the C-H bonds of alkyl gave rise to the release of CH(4) and C(2) hydrocarbons, and a large amount of CO and CO(2) evolved as the result of C=O decreasing, both processes indicated the decomposition of volatile compounds. The increasing absorbance amount of C-O and C-H(aromatic) demonstrated the formation of tar. As temperature increased further, the diminishing IR absorbance of C-O and C-H(aromatic) was accompanied by a significant reduction of tar yield and an increase of H(2). H(2) was considered as an indicator for the occurrence of tar cracking. The Diels-Alder reaction mechanism followed by dehydrogenation was employed to explain the PAHs formation. (C) 2010 Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据