4.7 Article

The effect of flow type patterns in a novel thermally coupled reactor for simultaneous direct dimethyl ether (DME) and hydrogen production

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 4354-4365

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.135

关键词

Direct DME synthesis; Hydrogen production; Cyclohexane dehydrogenation; Auto-thermal reactor; co- and counter-current; configurations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dimethyl ether (DME) has gained wide interest in chemical industry regarding its use as a multi-source, multi-purpose fuel either for diesel engines or as a clean alternative for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). The direct synthesis of DME from syngas would be more economical and beneficial in comparison to the indirect process via methanol dehydration. In this study, one type of the multifunctional auto-thermal reactors (the recuperative one) is selected in which the direct synthesis of dimethyl ether (DME) is coupled with the catalytic dehydrogenation of cyclohexane to benzene in a two fixed bed reactor separated by a solid wall, where heat is transferred across the surface of tube. Steady-state, heterogeneous, one-dimensional model has been used to describe the performance of this novel configuration. Both co-current and counter-current operating modes are investigated and the simulation results are compared with the available data of a pipe-shell fixed bed reactor for direct DME synthesis which operates at the same feed conditions. In addition, the influence of the molar flow rate of exothermic and endothermic stream on the reactor performance is also investigated. The results suggest that coupling of these reactions could be feasible and beneficial and the co-current mode has got better performance in DME and hydrogen production. In order to establish the validity and safety handling of the new concept, an experimental proof is required. Copyright (C) 2011, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据